Does standard insures quality?

If we define Quality Standard is it enough?
Does it really ensures quality things?

I think no,
Defining quality standard and implementing defined quality standard is 2 different phases of one big project. I have seen many good standard for many things. These quality standards defines many points that is necessory for quality product/service/process etc.. But these standards is usually not define way of implementation. Some times it defines but not the best way to implement. I know its not possible becase it varies from seatution to seatution.

Quality standard says things should look like this(like ideal things), But not how to make it as defined in quality standard. Some time some quality standard provides some guidlines to implement standard. But those are just guidelines not more then that. Because implementation varies from seatution to seatution.

Implementing a quality standard is very much important. quality has directly relation with profit. If you increase quality, profit will reduce and if you try to increase profit then quality reduces(assuming rest of parameter are constant for both the case).

So at the time of implement a quality standard there should be some quality checking mechanism that really ensures that quality is really there. Again my observation says implementation of such quality checking process is not defined in standard because implementation is seatution specific.

What do you think?